DETOUR AT BLISS COUNTY

Clint Eastwoods version of Robert James Wallers The Bridges of Madison County plays the adultery-with-meaning game just the way the blue hairs must empathize with because during the viewing I saw they were sobbing into their Puffs as if confessing their own “forbidden” loves. Listening to the sniffles, I got a case of the chills thinking what may be at the root of so many of our social problems isnt the lack of personal values but the ruinous insistence on trying to live out someone elses. Wallers boobheaded novel is the Love Story of the 90s, owing its apparently very strong emotional wallop to Noël Cowards Brief Encounter. Wallers weepy opus may go one step further into unaccredited attribution—its the equivalent of a Joseph Campbell-inspired romancer, filtered through the new found feminization of Eastwood as—are you ready?—Alan Alda as sensual Johnny Hartman. Unfortunately Eastwood as Robert the Holy Grail and Meryl Streep as Francesca the Martyress dont use the power of their common sense to at least “follow their bliss” to meet at the same time every year. Oh no, not these two: they endure torturous, long-separated silence until the very end, when theyre joined in death at one of Madison Countys fabled bridges in a way they never could be in life. The less you think about it, the more Madison County works; the more you think about it, the less tolerant you become: how convenient, even considering the cool down after heated sex, it gets chilly enough during a hot Iowa summer to fire up the logs. Eastwood seems to have inherited the physical legacy of Henry Fonda—its in the minimal utterances, the slight slump of the shoulders, the flattened fanny, the gait. And in these later years, hes become rather winsome in the way he looks fatigued and simian, not unlike one of his co-stars in Every Which Way But Loose. As Wallers romanticized National Geographic photographer, he has moments as his gifts to the ladies. The first kiss between Robert and Francesca is unlike anything Eastwoods done before and viewers are being swayed by the gentility: we can believe the tenderness in his slow motion advances, indicating hes read the latest womens woes-about-men books and Ann Landers columns about women preferring cuddling, endless smooching, almost eternal foreplay. His Robert is in search of a goddess as certainty; despite his nomadic lifestyle, which otherwise necessitates self-reliance, hes powered by the transcendental—the impossible quest for the ideal woman. Unlike the carpers who thought Streep would be wrong as Francesca, I believed from the start shed probably pull it off. (Had a younger actor been cast as Robert, Isabella Rossellini would have been the only other choice.) Cutting back on the thickness of an Italian accent (which sounds closer to Arianna Huffington), looking almost plumpy, Streeps Francesca, as if by environmental osmosis, has become Iowa-ized, and part of her anxious business—the jitters, the furtive peaks at the new man in town, the first dance and kiss—belong to the character. As actress, however, Streep may be too anxious, caught in a case of the shpilkes, causing us to start watching her more closely than we might want to: as in Silkwood, she cant smoke cigarettes convincingly (yet why is it in some of her movies she knows how to inhale grass?) and though we notice through Francescas boredom she maintains a clean house, we spot the somewhat dingy kitchen sink and stove and wonder why they havent been Ajaxed. Richard LaGraveneses script, faithful to Wallers sap, loads onto Streep and Eastwood scenes going on and on, and poor Streep suffers the most: when laden with a mixture of desire and false blame after a first round of love making, her brunt conflictions against Eastwood are right out of Psyche 101. As you think about it—and, reiterating, thinking about this movie is very dangerous—Streeps spewing is like a bulimics purging; its not pleasure shes upchucking, its a lifetime of regret. The final purge—for me, anyway—is the “Last Supper.” Francesca manages to collect herself, coming to terms with her commitment to her loveless marriage, and theres Robert, pouring the booze of commiseration. All I could think about during this dreariness was whether the insect stealing too many seconds was intentional. If still vogue, Streep’s “auteur” in her characters, even in comedy, carry more impedimenta than her co-stars. (Only Nicholson in Ironweed matches the weighty baggage.) So of course her burdens are far heavier to carry than Eastwoods, her Francesca has to be satisfied an intense four day affair will endure the coming years of the pain of being married to the meal ticket whos also the father of her two children. The legacy of Francescas dissatisfaction is almost the fate of her daughter too, until she discovers the “meaning” of the bridges of Madison County. Typical of lamebrained romantic writers—sacrificing the heroines own glory of love while thinking its perfectly acceptable to bequeath it to a dipshit the audience doesnt give one damn about.

BACK  NEXT  HOME

ralphbenner@nowreviewing.com

Text COPYRIGHT © 2007 RALPH BENNER  All Rights Reserved.