STRAITJACKET & FISHNET & BABY PINS It’s well known Bette Davis fought with director William Wyler over how to play Regina in Lillian Hellman’s The Little Foxes. In the annals of on-set wars, theirs are considered legendary. As the story goes, Bette wanted to hold Regina in total check, restricting Wyler’s demand for a range of softer touches. She even had cosmetic designer Perc Westmore subversively oblige her insistence by creating an unflattering makeup for the character—a “facial” as venomous mock of Tallulah Bankhead. Here is where the facts about the battles get fuzzy: Bette reluctantly agreed to see the play but came away with the conclusion Bankhead’s interpretation was the right one, and though Wyler also thought she was stellar, neither he nor his star seemed to agree what in Bankhead’s portrayal would be reproduced on film. Wyler was said to have wanted from Bette some of the extravagantly packaged slithering Bankhead is famous for, including her poise, charm, humor and (alleged) sexiness. On stage, a “star” can use Regina to mount posturing and command dramatic stillness and we love watching the theatrics because she is in the flesh. (The reason Elizabeth Taylor managed to score a hit revival in the early 80s.) On screen, though, the part is exposed as anorexic—starved of meaningful innards. A guess, Wyler likely conceded Regina hadn’t much of a heart and hoped to devise elements to suggest she might have had one at one time and, equally a hunch, Bette saw the limitations and constructs a fidgety to frosty severity as means to conclusion. (And clearly they want to avoid duplicating her angst in Jezebel and especially The Letter, in which she’s a roller-coaster and as such a dazzling ride.) Facilitated by a heatwave keeping the sets excessively hot, by Wyler’s snippy criticism at instead of support to Bette between takes and by her growing insecurity over her portrayal, what apparently happened is the raging private wars of attraction and possession by estranged lovers erupted to blind them both and thus one of the longest running fights goes on: Is Bette the real thing as Regina? (I side with the doubters.) The play can be sustained on the power of the bitch; the movie fizzles because its inherent paltriness is exposed—Hellman’s familial sins are blackmail threats as claustrophobic small-mindedness. (There’s a petty cash feel on money matters in Toys in the Attic too.) We also just as easily ascertain more details of Regina’s relationship with her husband are required—we get stewing Regina’s admission of hate for her husband but we really need a news update on her repressed sexuality. (In early drafts, Hellman had the husband suffering from syphilis, contouring Regina’s sublimation.) Still, Bette is superlative in her obduracy, and I like the way she’s coifed and attired: Orry-Kelly has designed some pretty regal formals and there’s something queerly satisfying when she wears a hat with fishnet covering her face. Hellman adapted, with Dorothy Parker, Alan Campbell and Arthur Kober adding filler. Photography by Gregg Toland; the attractively appointed interior decoration by Stephen Goosson and Howard Bristol includes a masterpiece leather chair for Bette’s husband Herbert Marshall; music by Meredith Wilson.
Text COPYRIGHT © 2001 RALPH BENNER All Rights Reserved. |